JOPIC

The JoPIC is an independent-unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open-access journal of current national and international issues and reviews for original clinical and experimental research, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, differential diagnoses, editorial opinions, letters to the editor, and educational papers in pulmonology, thoracic surgery, occupational diseases, allergology, and intensive care medicine. This journal is indexed by indices that are considered international scientific journal indices (DRJI, ESJI, OAJI, etc.). According to the current Associate Professorship criteria, it is within the scope of International Article 1-d. Each article published in this journal corresponds to 5 points.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Comparison of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in surgically treated lung carcinoid tumors
Aims: This study aims to compare the efficacy of FDG-18 PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging techniques in patients with lung carcinoid tumors, identifying the most appropriate preoperative nuclear medicine technique for diagnosis and staging.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 123 patients who underwent surgery for lung carcinoid tumors at our center between 2009 and 2021. All of the patients were scanned with FDG-18 PET/CT before surgery. In addition to FDG-18 PET/CT, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scanning was performed in 28 patients: 17 in the preoperative and 11 in the postoperative period. Demographic data, mean higher maximal standard uptake (SUVmax) values of primary mass, lymph nodes and extrathoracic foci, pathologic subtype, and type of surgery were recorded. Compliance with normal distribution for numerical data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was employed for groups meeting normal distribution to compare continuous numerical variables. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used when normal distribution assumptions were unsatisfied.
Results: The mean SUVmax value in 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was significantly higher than FDG-18 PET/CT in patients with a lung carcinoid tumor (20 vs 4.4). For 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan, typical carcinoids had higher mean SUVmax value than atypical carcinoids (26 and 5.6 respectively), and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.002). For that FDG18 PET/CT, on the contrary, the mean SUVmax value was higher in atypical carcinoids than typical carcinoids (5.4 and 3.8, respectively), and the difference was not significant (p=0.126)
Conclusion: The SUVmax values from 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and FDG-18 PET/CT in lung carcinoid tumors vary by tumor subtype. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrates higher SUVmax values in typical carcinoid tumors, indicating its superiority over FDG-18 PET/CT for this subtype. Although 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT also shows elevated SUVmax in atypical carcinoid tumors, the difference compared to FDG-18 PET/CT does not reach statistical significance.


1. Karapolat İ. FDG PET/CT ımaging for evaluation of treatment response in lung cancer. Nukleer Tıp Seminerleri. 2018;4(1):43.
2. Kitajima K, Doi H, Kanda T, et al. Present and future roles of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of lung cancer. <em>Japan J Radiol</em>. 2016;34(6):387-99.
3. Krenning EP, Valkema R, Kwekkeboom DJ, et al. Molecular imaging as in vivo molecular pathology for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: implications for follow-up after therapy. <em>J Nucl Med</em>. 2005;46(1 suppl):76S-82S.
4. Evangelista L, Ravelli I, Bignotto A, Cecchin D, Zucchetta P. Ga-68 DOTA-peptides and F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumor: a review. <em>Clin Imaging</em>. 2020;67:113-116.
5. Jiang Y, Hou G, Cheng W. The utility of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-Peptide PET/CT in the evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>Medicine</em>. 2019;98(10):e14769.
6. Lococo F, Perotti G, Cardillo G, et al. Multicenter comparison of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT for pulmonary carcinoid. <em>Clin Nucl Med</em>. 2015;40(3):e183-e9.
7. Ramirez RA, Chauhan A, Gimenez J, Thomas KE, Kokodis I, Voros BA. Management of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. <em>Rev Endocr Metab Disord</em>. 2017;18(4):433-442.
8. Rosado de Christenson ML, Abbott GF, Kirejczyk WM, Galvin JR, Travis WD. From the archives of the AFIP: thoracic carcinoids: radiologic-pathologic correlation. <em>Radiographics.</em> 1999;19(3):707-736.
9. Hauso O, Gustafsson BI, Kidd M, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology: contrasting Norway and North America. <em>Cancer</em>. 2008; 113(10):2655-2664.
10. Geijer H, Breimer LH. Somatostatin receptor PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumours: update on systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</em>. 2013;40(11):1770-1780.
11. Antunes P, Ginj M, Zhang H, et al. Are radiogallium-labelled DOTA-conjugated somatostatin analogues superior to those labelled with other radiometals? <em>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</em>. 2007;34(7):982-993.
12. Raphael MJ, Chan DL, Law C, Singh S. Principles of diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumours. <em>Cmaj</em>. 2017;189(10):E398-E404.
13. Filosso PL, Oliaro A, Ruffini E, et al. Outcome and prognostic factors in bronchial carcinoids: a single-center experience. <em>J Thorac Oncol</em>. 2013; 8(10):1282-1288.
14. Gosain R, Mukherjee S, Yendamuri SS, Iyer R. Management of typical and atypical pulmonary carcinoids based on different established guidelines. <em>Cancers</em>. 2018;10(12):510.
15. Singh S, Poon R, Wong R, Metser U. 68Ga PET imaging in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>J Nucl Med</em>. 2018;43(11):802-810.
16. Ouml;berg K, Knigge U, Kwekkeboom D, Perren A. Neuroendocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic tumors: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. <em>Ann Oncol</em>. 2012;23(Suppl 7):vii124-vii130.
17. Kayani I, Conry BG, Groves AM, et al. A comparison of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. <em>J Nucl Med</em>. 2009;50(12):1927-1932.
Volume 2, Issue 4, 2024
Page : 77-80
_Footer