JOPIC

The JoPIC is an independent-unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open-access journal of current national and international issues and reviews for original clinical and experimental research, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, differential diagnoses, editorial opinions, letters to the editor, and educational papers in pulmonology, thoracic surgery, occupational diseases, allergology, and intensive care medicine.

EndNote Style
Index
Case Report
Adenocarcinoma of the lung mimicking interstitial lung disease
Although benign reactive conditions can be misinterpreted as malignancies, a number of malignant lesions can in turn be mistaken for interstitial lung disease. A nonsmoking male aged 66 years who presented with multifocal dispersed, parenchymal and subpleural nodules, most of them cavitated or pseudocavitated, and that radiologically mimicked non-malignant conditions, such as pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis or peribronchiolar organising pneumonia with bronchiectasis on computed tomography scan, was hospitalised. Microbiological and immunological tests were negative. Since sufficient tissue could not be obtained via bronchoscopy, the patient was scheduled for video-assisted thoracic surgery. The final diagnosis revealed invasive adenocarcinoma with a predominant lepidic pattern.


1. Garfield DH, Cadranel JL, Wislez M, Franklin WA, Hirsch FR. The bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and peripheral adenocarcinoma spectrum of diseases. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1(4):344-359. doi:10.1016/S1556-0864(15)31593-8
2. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. ERS/ATS/IASLC classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(2):244-285.
3. Gaeta M, Blandino A, Pergolizzi S, et al. Radiolucencies and cavitation in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: CT-pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(1):55-59. doi:10.1007/s003300050627
4. Reed SL, O’Neil KM. Cheerios in the chest. Chest. 1993;104(4):1267-1268. doi:10.1378/chest.104.4.1267
5. Chou SH, Kicska G, Kanne JP, Pipavath S. Cheerio sign. J Thorac Imaging. 2013;28(1):W4. doi:10.1097/RTI.0b013e31827944d2
6. Tailor TD, Schmidt RA, Eaton KD, Wood DE, Pipavath SN. The pseudocavitation sign of lung adenocarcinoma: a distinguishing feature and imaging biomarker of lepidic growth. J Thorac Imaging. 2015;30(4): 308-313. doi:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000168
7. Chen CJ, Lee BF, Yao WJ, et al. Dual-phase 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules with an initial standard uptake value less than 2.5. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):475-479. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3457
8. Domen H, Hida Y, Okamoto S, et al. Histopathologic characterization of lung adenocarcinoma in relation to fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(9): 874-882. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyt100
9. Detterbeck FC, Marom EM, Arenberg DA, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: background data and proposals for the application of TNM staging rules to lung cancer presenting as multiple nodules with ground glass or lepidic features or a pneumonic type of involvement in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(4):666-680. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2015.12.113
10. Liu M, He WX, Song N, et al. Discrepancy of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as multiple ground-glass opacities. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(5):909-913. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw113
Volume 3, Issue 1, 2025
Page : 18-20
_Footer