JOPIC

The JoPIC is an independent-unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open-access journal of current national and international issues and reviews for original clinical and experimental research, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, differential diagnoses, editorial opinions, letters to the editor, and educational papers in pulmonology, thoracic surgery, occupational diseases, allergology, and intensive care medicine.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
The relationship between elevated blood metal levels and pneumoconiosis profusion scores and opacity size: a study on foundry workers
Aims: This study aims to describe the demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics of foundry workers diagnosed with pneumoconiosis and to examine the association between blood metal levels and disease severity, particularly Labour Organization (ILO) pneumoconiosis radiologic profusion and opacity.
Methods: A total of 45 foundry workers with radiologically confirmed pneumoconiosis were included. Data on age, smoking history, pulmonary function tests, occupational duration, and working units were collected. Radiological assessment was performed using the International ILO classification. Workers were categorized into two groups based on whole blood metal concentration (normal vs. elevated). Comparative and correlation analyses were conducted.
Results: The cohort consisted predominantly of males (97.8%) with a mean age of 50.1 ± 7.8 years and a mean work duration of 18.3 ± 8.9 years. Profusion scores were category 1 in 55.6% and category >1 in 44.4%. Opacity types were mostly small and rounded (type p, 75.6%). A statistically significant inverse correlation was found between blood metal levels and profusion score (r = –0.348, p = 0.019), while profusion and opacity size were positively correlated (r = 0.335, p = 0.025). Work duration and smoking showed no significant association with radiologic severity. Workers in grinding and sandblasting units, despite “normal” blood metal levels, had more advanced radiological findings.
Conclusion: Disease severity may not directly correlate with measured blood metal levels but appears influenced by particle type, work unit, and preventive practices. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive occupational risk assessments beyond blood metal biomonitoring.


1. Leung CC, Yu IT, Chen W. Silicosis. Lancet. 2012;379(9830):2008-18. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(12)60235-9
2. Cosgrove MP. Pulmonary fibrosis and exposure to steel welding fume. Occup Med (Lond). 2015;65(9):706-712. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqv093
3. Zhou S, Wang Y, Yu C, et al. Metal exposure-related Welder’s pneumoconiosis and lung function: a cross-sectional study in a container factory of China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24): 16809. doi:10.3390/ijerph192416809
4. International Labour Organization. Guidelines for the use of the ILO International Classification of radiographs of pneumoconioses. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO; 2022. file:///C:/Users/10/Downloads/wcms_ 867859%20(6).pdf
5. Antonini JM. Health effects of welding. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2003;33(1):61-103. doi:10.1080/713611032
6. Singh S, Sachdeva RA, Sen MK. Clinico-radiological profile of Welders and metal fumes exposure patients and the role of bronchoalveolar lavage ferritin levels in the diagnosis of Welder’s pneumoconiosis. J Assoc Chest Physicians. 2025;13(2):63-69. doi:10.4103/jacp.jacp_26_25
7. Fishwick D, Bradshaw LM, Slater T, Pearce N. Respiratory symptoms, across-shift lung function changes and lifetime exposures of welders in New Zealand. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23(5):351-358. doi:10. 5271/sjweh.231
8. Han D, Goo JM, Im JG, Lee KS, Paek DM, Park SH. Thin-section CT findings of arc-welders’ pneumoconiosis. Korean J Radiol. 2000;1(2):79-83. doi:10.3348/kjr.2000.1.2.79
9. Antonini JM, Lewis AB, Roberts JR, Whaley DA. Pulmonary effects of welding fumes: review of worker and experimental animal studies. Am J Ind Med. 2003;43(4):350-360. doi:10.1002/ajim.10194
10. Kleinfeld M, Messite J, Kooyman O, Shapiro J. Welders’ siderosis. A clinical, roentgenographic, and physiological study. Arch Environ Health. 1969;19(1):70-73. doi:10.1080/00039896.1969.10666806
11. Mozaffari S, Heibati B, Jaakkola MS, et al. Effects of occupational exposures on respiratory health in steel factory workers. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1082874. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1082874
12. Fernie JM, Ruckley VA. Coalworkers’ pneumoconiosis: correlation between opacity profusion and number and type of dust lesions with special reference to opacity type. Br J Ind Med. 1987;44(4):273-277. doi: 10.1136/oem.44.4.273
13. Li T, Yang X, Xu H, Liu H. Early identification, accurate diagnosis, and treatment of silicosis. Can Respir J. 2022;2022:3769134. doi:10.1155/ 2022/3769134
14. Christiani DC, Mehta AJ, Yu CL. Genetic susceptibility to occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(6):430-436. doi:10.1136/oem. 2007.033977
15. Hayashi H, Ashizawa K, Takahashi M, et al. The diagnosis of early pneumoconiosis in dust-exposed workers: comparison of chest radiography and computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2022;63(7):909-913. doi:10.1177/02841851211022501
16. Su X, Kong X, Yu X, Zhang X. Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023;13(3):e065114. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065114
Volume 3, Issue 3, 2025
Page : 53-57
_Footer